Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Jan 2013 18:47 UTC
Permalink for comment 550914
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-18
so you only get 23 Gbs from a 64 GBs (as advertised) device.... how lovely! That sucks, no matter how you wanna see it.
As a side note, about people asking why the bare system would take up 41 GBs when compared with a regular desktop/laptop/netbook, whatever, even with a lot of software installed on them. Keep in mind that ARM binaries tend to be larger than x86 binaries due to the fact that all instructions on 32-bit ARM (unless using thumb) are 4-byte long unlike x86 which has a variable length for instructions.
I think that's still no excuse for having a system take 41 GBs as a whole when "just installed" but it's a factor when making the comparison.
I for one won't buy any, for sure... even it it only took 1 GB of room and let me with 63 GBs to play with.