Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Jan 2013 02:17 UTC
Permalink for comment 550930
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-09
Yep I miss'em too. Not enough to want to go back there though. I remember tiptoeing around flaws in specific chips with particular operating systems.
Heck - even 287 chips that would throw a wobbly given a very specific combination of valid (FP) arithmetic inputs. It was reproduceable very consistently. Took a few engineers a while to spot that it was the chip, not the high level code and not the compiler!