Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 1st Feb 2013 18:25 UTC
Permalink for comment 551229
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-02-11
First of all learn to use paragraphs, your post is really difficult to read.
Anyway, the Lumia 800 was released in Q4 2011 but was available in many countries in Q1 2012. And the Lumia 900 became available in Q2 2012. Both phones where marketed as flagship phones and where quite expensive. And then, only months later the platform was essentially abandoned. So while it's true that MS didn't deliver less than they promised they can't expect their customers (or partners) to be very happy about this.