Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 9th Feb 2013 18:54 UTC
Permalink for comment 552203
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-05-30
Windows 3.1 had multiple Kernels too. Windows 95 shifted the differences tot he HAL, but there were multiple HAL's for the different processor families (AMD, INTEL, Cyrix etc) and if you installed Window 95 on one box, the HAL might be so specific that it wouldn't actually boot without a lot of effort on another. That issue still exists with XP (if you've ever tried to move an XP hard disk, or VM image even, to a new [virtual] machine, you'll know this specific pain.)