Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 12th Feb 2013 18:27 UTC
Windows "Imagine a phone that could run real Remote Desktop. Real PowerShell. Anything that can run on your desktop PC. Imagine 'phablet' form factors, similar to today's Samsung Galaxy Note 2, which could dock to a desktop setup and utilize an external display, keyboard, mouse, and other peripherals. Imagine a single set of APIs that work everywhere. Imagine that Phone isn't a whole separate platform, but an app. An app that runs on Windows. Real Windows. The Windows Phone team could never make that happen. But the Windows client team? You betcha. Make it happen, Microsoft. It's time to take the phone seriously." I have never agreed with Thurrot as much as I do right now.
Permalink for comment 552248
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: This guy is off his rocker
by Nelson on Tue 12th Feb 2013 19:25 UTC in reply to "This guy is off his rocker"
Member since:

I just think he's too idealistic. While the goal of sharing a platform between the two is ideal. Running the SAME uncompiled apps is not, in my opinion.

That would be a disaster for Microsoft. Instead I think they should strive to create "Bundles" where by if I buy App1 on WP and its available on the Windows Store, I should automatically receive it.

Storage between the two apps should be unified, support for roaming profiles, In App Purchases should carry over, etc.

I don't think Microsoft won't do it, just that they haven't and likely wont do it in a timeline that makes sense to me and other developers. There's so much potential. Hopefully now that a lot of the blood letting is over after the WP7 to WP8 transition, we can see much more parallels drawn.

I don't think Win8 is a disaster, but I understand that a lot of people in tech circles will see it like that for the duration of its life. Then Windows 9 will come along with minimal tweaks (None of which include bringing the Start Menu back) and people will suddenly fall in love with it. Perception is a funny thing.

Look at Windows 7, very very marginal improvements over Vista yet people went crazy over it like it was the best thing ever despite it being a "Meh" release in many respects.

You had the Vista haters suddenly mum on the same things they crowed about in 2006. "OMG DRM, OMG DWM, OMG AERO, OMG I HATE THIS NEW START MENU"

now in Windows 8 its "OMG I MISS AERO, OMG I MISS MY START MENU" and DRM never materialized into the doomsday scenario the FSF and RMS envisioned.

This is why its hard for me to take a lot of the criticism people levy seriously, especially when it seems that everyone parrots each other. Do a search on this website for "jarring". I guarantee you a majority of the hits will be Windows 8 comments. Its peculiar that everyone uses the same exact verbiage to demagogue the same feature. People just repeat what they've heard.

If I break down the Windows 8 criticism its two categories:

- Complaining about minor things Microsoft has done. Removed Start Menu, made Hot Corners, Full Screen apps, etc.

- Complaining speculatively about the future
Omg but what if Microsoft removes the Desktop in the future?

Which to me is in the same vein that Vista hate was in. People complaining about minor things (Start Menu, DWM, etc) and people speculating on the future (DRM is evil).

This too shall pass. Microsoft will sell hundreds of millions of licenses like they always do, release Windows 9, and suddenly everyone has amnesia about why they disliked Windows 8 in the first place.

I really wish some people would've been here through the absolutely hilarious hysteria that was the Vista release cycle. Then seen the almost 180 by the SAME people during the Windows 7 release cycle. People are fickle.

Reply Parent Score: 1