Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 11th Feb 2013 22:59 UTC
Permalink for comment 552329
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
Laurence,
In this sense all languages are equal because they're all turing complete. I find javascript is quite a good language but often times it's used in contexts it really isn't very well suited for because it's the only language available. The document object model has alot of evolutionary baggage and it's virtually impossible to optimize for native performance, but we are stuck with it in the foreseeable future.
I liked perl as well, after all it is the gold standard for regular expressions and fundamentally incorporates IO in novel ways. I prefer it infinitely over bash shell scripting (UGH). But the number of competing frameworks/libraries in CPAN (117K) is overwhelming, consequently perl code is many times more fragmented than C++. I like CPAN's moto though "Stop reinventing wheels, start building space rockets". I wonder if it's meant sarcastically because the horse has already left the stable a long, long time ago.