Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 15th Feb 2013 10:40 UTC
Permalink for comment 552610
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
I have a love/hate relationship with articles like these.
On the one hand it's great to promote readable code, but sometimes I think people get too hung up on what they deem as perfect syntax and can sometimes miss the point of those clever optimisations.
It's a bit like grammar Nazi's who love to correct peoples comments but rarely read deep enough into those posts digest the content being explained.
So I guess what I'm trying to say is that it's good to be reminded about preferred programming practices, just as long as we don't forget the other criteria (usability, performance (if applicable), deadlines)
Edited 2013-02-15 13:59 UTC