Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 15th Feb 2013 10:40 UTC
Permalink for comment 552929
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-08-08
No, ... I'm saying the judgment that code is "bad" is often merely subjective. I'm not defending code that is broken, buggy, etc. For some reason that seems to have gone over some heads here.
lack of clarity: Disagree because it's too subjective. While code might be confusing to "you", it may be perfectly clear to another more able or experienced coder.
unnecessary complexity: Agreed.
insane difficulty to maintain: Generally agree. However, maintenance difficulty could be too influenced by a persons ability or lack thereof. If someone has trouble maintaining code it could be that they just aren't a very capable coder and not because the code itself is terrible. Remember, just because a person gets paid to code, doesn't mean they're good at it.
bugs: Agreed.