Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 15th Feb 2013 10:40 UTC
General Development "Since I left my job at Amazon I have spent a lot of time reading great source code. Having exhausted the insanely good idSoftware pool, the next thing to read was one of the greatest game of all time: Duke Nukem 3D and the engine powering it named 'Build'. It turned out to be a difficult experience: The engine delivered great value and ranked high in terms of speed, stability and memory consumption but my enthousiasm met a source code controversial in terms of organization, best practices and comments/documentation. This reading session taught me a lot about code legacy and what helps a software live long." Hail to the king, baby.
Permalink for comment 553263
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: Code Review
by Alfman on Wed 20th Feb 2013 19:30 UTC in reply to "RE[8]: Code Review"
Member since:


"It is not that simple actually. I've seen assembly level programmers who really know what they do, and they do it well, however, that usually was at the micro-optimization level, which doesn't scale to long-lived and/or big softwares."

This is it in a nutshell, large projects cannot be written in assembly any more. But it can still be used effectively to tune pieces of a larger project.

"All in all I am not sure if you are evangelizing Assembly, C or compilers in your post."

You weren't addressing me, but I strongly prefer C. The only time I ever consider assembly is with code that I'm already benchmarking and have identified performance deficiencies. But I try to get the most out of the C version before resorting to assembly code.

Reply Parent Score: 2