Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Feb 2013 20:48 UTC
Permalink for comment 553423
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-07-15
As a high-end user, why would I buy this? ChromeOS is just, well, Chrome. For significantly less I could get a real laptop with more storage, more power, and run Chrome as well as everything else I might want. For just a little bit more, I could get a Macbook with a screen that's just as good (for all practical purposes), and can run Chrome as well as anything else I might want. Why would I spend $1300 on something that has inferior storage, an inferior os, and is far too over-powered for the purpose resulting in crappy battery life? The only thing this offers is a touch screen, but let's be honest, this is a laptop. How many people are going to want to reach their arm up to the top and touch tabs just to activate them? I don't know about anyone else here, but my arms would get tired mighty quick.
If Google had wanted to make a bit of a splash, they should've released a nice ChromeOS tablet with this screen. I could have seen a practical purpose for that. This just makes me wonder what the top engineers at Google are smoking. Essentially, it's a touch screen that's not a tablet, and a laptop that's incapable as a laptop.