Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 24th Feb 2013 17:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 553665
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-11-29
There's cheap, and then there's unsustainable. It is fine for HP to have a low to mid range portfolio, but when low range means sub $200 it starts to get a little ridiculous. The price erosion going on is not likely healthy for anybody.
Its probably why Apple isn't participating, they decided they'd rather still make healthy margins on the iPad Mini rather than go dirt cheap.
Prices in this case are sticky-up and it will prove very difficult for HP and others to at some point in the future start extracting healthy margins.