Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Feb 2013 21:31 UTC
Permalink for comment 553732
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-22
What they don't do is scan your email and then sell the collected data to third parties for the purpose of targeting advertising.
I know we have differed on this issue before but in my opinion a company whose sole revenue earning business is the collection of data about the users of it's services so that it can sell advertising has a business dynamic that drives it to try collect as much user data as it can. That dynamic, the drive to collect as much user data as possible, is not present or nearly as strong in companies whose revenues earning business is not based on the collection of user data.
I would have thought that this was pretty obvious and fairly non-contentious.
Privacy issues are about business dynamics, not ethics or juvenile concepts like 'good' and 'evil'. If your business is mining for copper you will seek to mine ever more copper from the best seams. If your business is mining for data you will seek to mine ever more data from the best seams.