Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 3rd Mar 2013 13:48 UTC
Permalink for comment 554158
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-14
Yes, it depends on your definition of "largest". Publicly traded companies are pretty much the only ones you could include on a list of market capitalization with any accuracy. So when someone says "the largest" market capitalization is one thing they could mean, in which case Apple would be the largest. If they meant in terms of revenue or profit or dividends payed out, or number of employees, or number of private jets, then they would be wrong. When someone makes such an arbitrary and ill defined statement, its much more difficult to prove them wrong. I, for one, just wouldn't try to without clarifying exactly what I think they meant in context of the overall statement. Otherwise it will end in a pointless argument. Although, this exchange between us is kind of pointless too. Good job.
You should have also noticed that the list is not restricted to companies listed on United States Stock Exchanges.