
"The White House
agrees with the 114.000+ of you who believe that consumers should be able to unlock their cell phones without risking criminal or other penalties. In fact, we believe the same principle should also apply to tablets, which are increasingly similar to smart phones. And if you have paid for your mobile device, and aren't bound by a service agreement or other obligation, you should be able to use it on another network. It's common sense, crucial for protecting consumer choice, and important for ensuring we continue to have the vibrant, competitive wireless market that delivers innovative products and solid service to meet consumers' needs."
Member since:
2010-06-09
So basically, they don't agree with us.
No, if you include the rest of that sentence and the ones before it, I think what they're saying is:
1) it shouldn't be a criminal act to unlock a phone.
2) if you aren't bound by a service agreement, it shouldn't be locked in the first place.
Edited 2013-03-04 19:56 UTC