Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Mar 2013 19:00 UTC
Microsoft One of the major lacking features in the newest Office: no Metro applications. In fact, the only reason Windows RT has a desktop at all is because the Office team was unable to create Metro applications in time for the release of Windows RT. I often thought this was a classic case of two important divisions within Microsoft not getting along and not being aligned, but now that I have my own Surface RT, I'm starting to realise that there's a far simpler, and thus more likely, explanation: Metro is simply not ready for anything serious - or for anything at all, really.
Permalink for comment 554383
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
At least they look nice...
by bowkota on Wed 6th Mar 2013 19:18 UTC
bowkota
Member since:
2011-10-12

At least the Metro apps look nice while they're busy crashing, being slow, laggy etc. Who cares about usability when you have flat design?

As for early OS X, the only 'unusable' non-beta version was Cheetah. From Puma onwards it was more than usable. I have to endure Linux on an everyday basis for work so I think I'm a pretty good judge on usability.

Reply Score: 10