Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Mar 2013 19:00 UTC
Permalink for comment 554397
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
It wasn't the "first few" Mac OS X releases that were bad, it was the first one or at most two (my cousin, who's a graphic designer, had one that ran Puma, and that was pretty reliable). It was certainly ready for public consumption from Jaguar, and my first ran Panther and that was superb.
In fact, Macs dual booted with Mac OS 9 when OS X was first released. It was essentially a technology preview, and most people still had old style Mac apps.