Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Mar 2013 10:35 UTC
Legal "Apple vs. Samsung initially ended with a billion-dollar verdict in favor of Apple, but there have been plenty of wrinkles since. This week brought about another, as Nokia filed an amicus brief on behalf of Apple, Inc. in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In the brief filed Monday, Nokia asked the court to permit permanent injunctions on the sale of Samsung phones that were found to infringe Apple's patents." In the meantime, the latest comScore figures for the US show that Windows Phone's market share actually declined during the launch of Windows Phone 8. It's pretty clear that, combined with the disappointing quarterly results for Nokia, the company is setting itself up for the future. In this future, Nokia's patent portfolio is worth more than their actual phone business, and as such, Nokia can't do anything but support Apple in this case, else the value of their portfolio goes down.
Permalink for comment 554465
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Not unexpected
by bowkota on Thu 7th Mar 2013 12:37 UTC
Member since:

Nokia has a very strong patent portfolio, as strong as IBM's in their respective business. It's to be expected that they don't want a dangerous precent set with this case because it would seriously devalue the worth of their own patents.

There's a current system based on a certain set of rules; you either follow them or you change them.

I don't agree with the patent system at large; get rid of it. I wouldn't want to see a current Galaxy device being banned because of patents and Apple shouldn't be paying companies licensing fees for stuff they invented in the 90s.

However, I also consider ridiculous and outrageous the blatant ripoff from Samsung on many Apple related stuff (software, hardware, retail, there are countless examples).

Edited 2013-03-07 12:43 UTC

Reply Score: 3