Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Mar 2013 10:35 UTC
Legal "Apple vs. Samsung initially ended with a billion-dollar verdict in favor of Apple, but there have been plenty of wrinkles since. This week brought about another, as Nokia filed an amicus brief on behalf of Apple, Inc. in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In the brief filed Monday, Nokia asked the court to permit permanent injunctions on the sale of Samsung phones that were found to infringe Apple's patents." In the meantime, the latest comScore figures for the US show that Windows Phone's market share actually declined during the launch of Windows Phone 8. It's pretty clear that, combined with the disappointing quarterly results for Nokia, the company is setting itself up for the future. In this future, Nokia's patent portfolio is worth more than their actual phone business, and as such, Nokia can't do anything but support Apple in this case, else the value of their portfolio goes down.
Permalink for comment 554555
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: It isn't about Samsung
by kwan_e on Thu 7th Mar 2013 22:06 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: It isn't about Samsung"
kwan_e
Member since:
2007-02-18

Do you think that the rate of innovation is low in the mobile space? Watch other industries. There's the initial boom, rapid innovation, a small period of litigation, then relative peace. No industry has really blown itself up over patents historically.


There was a well written article a while back about the stymieing affect of patents on England's train industry.

And yes, I do think that innovation is low in the mobile space where patents are involved. None of Apple's patents are really innovative.

Quality, not quantity.

Reply Parent Score: 3