Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Mar 2013 10:26 UTC
Permalink for comment 555497
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-03-26
On PCs sure. But I've yet to hear about Android malware spreading via adverts (if you have any evidence to the contrary then I'd be interested to read it
Furthermore, preventing advert-based malware from spreading on the PC can be largely mitigated by disabling a few things like Java plugins from auto-starting. Plus doing so will prevent other drive-by download attacks as well (eg hacked legitimate sites) where as using adblockers will not.
So I really don't agree with adblockers as security precaution. At best, it prevents one niche of attacks which would be prevented anyway if you took the precautions required to prevent the other forms of drive-by download attacks. In laymans terms, what you're proposing is snake oil.
As for Android, I do not demand free content; if there's an ad-based 'free' version and an ad-less paid version, I am happy to pay for it.
Sadly you're in the minority there. Which is exactly why I said I'd rather have seen Google trusting users than removing the opinion, but trusting users to "do the right thing" is rarely every going to work.
It's not too hard to work out:
* If it's free and it looks like some effort has gone into it, then it's ad funded.
* If there's a free version and a "premium" version, then the free version will be ad funded.
* And if the former two points don't help, then just read through the comments before installing.
People rarely pay any attention to the permissions list when installing new applications as it is, adding other things like whether it's ad supported would just create an even bigger wall of text and encourage more people not to bother.
Edited 2013-03-14 23:44 UTC