Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Mar 2013 21:09 UTC
Legal Late last week, Nokia dropped what many consider to be a bomb on the WebM project: a list of patents that VP8 supposedly infringes in the form of an IETF IPR declaration. The list has made the rounds around the web, often reported as proof that VP8 infringes upon Nokia's patents. All this stuff rang a bell. Haven't we been here before? Yup, we have, with another open source codec called Opus. Qualcomm and Huawei made the same claims as Nokia did, but they turned out to be complete bogus. As it turns out, this is standard practice in the dirty business of the patent licensing industry.
Permalink for comment 556678
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Big picture...
by lucas_maximus on Tue 26th Mar 2013 13:47 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Big picture..."
lucas_maximus
Member since:
2009-08-18

Fair enough, did a bit more googling and the file sizes differences are negligible now.

However performance wise ...

https://gist.github.com/Hupotronic/4645784

H.264 encoded with the latest x264 offers notably higher quality while encoding almost twice as fast as VP8 encoded with the latest libvpx offering. If you see a test claiming that VP8 is better than H.264 quality-wise, it is very likely that the comparison was done poorly, either by mistake or intentionally. I very much recommend reading this article by x264 developer Jason Garrett-Glaser on the subject.

Reply Parent Score: 3