Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 14th Apr 2013 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Windows You can say what you will about Windows Phone and Windows 8's Metro interface (I refuse to drop that name) - it's inefficient, unpopular, cumbersome, beautiful, ugly, organised, clean, limiting - but there's one thing we can all agree on: it's unique and distinctive. CNet has published a profile of Microsoft's Albert Shum, the man behind Metro, and he highlights what I think is at the very core of Microsoft's problems in mobile right now.
Permalink for comment 558536
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Unique and distinctive is the problem
by dpJudas on Mon 15th Apr 2013 11:51 UTC
dpJudas
Member since:
2009-12-10

I think perhaps the single most important reason for the market rejection of Windows Phone and Windows 8 is that Metro is so unique and distinctive.

I believe people like Thom when they say they think Metro is beautiful. Personally I consider it perhaps the ugliest UI I have every seen. It basically fails at *everything* for me: flat boring boxes with text, monochrome colored icons (wtf!), no visual cues whatsoever and no familiar UI guidelines followed. All alternatives seem to be offering me a better user experience, whether it being Linux, OS X, iOS or Android.

And those live tiles. I simply cannot express how much I hate looking at them. For me they are more of an anti-feature.

The end result is that for an apparently large segment of the population the Metro UX itself is such a deal breaker that it doesn't really matter what else the platform has to offer. A successful UI cannot afford to divide the tides like this, and that is why I think their phones are so unpopular.

Reply Score: 5