Linked by MOS6510 on Wed 17th Apr 2013 21:20 UTC
General Development "You often hear about how important it is to write 'readable code'. Developers have pretty strong opinions about what makes code more readable. The more senior the developer, the stronger the opinion. But, have you ever stopped to think about what really makes code readable?"
Permalink for comment 559223
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Not sure I agree
by Neolander on Fri 19th Apr 2013 09:44 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Not sure I agree"
Member since:

So, I have tried the "Try Erlang" interactive shell's tutorials, then gotten into Learn You Some Erlang for Great Good, but at this point the language just seems too random for me.

While I like some core concepts like atoms, list comprehensions, or the message-passing concurrency model, what strikes me as annoying is the design of the language itself, such as the silent conversion of lists to strings, the brainf--k-like operator syntax, or the way comparisons of atoms with integers result in random results rather than exceptions.

Perhaps I'll try Erlang again if I need to at some point, but for now I'm rather going to look for a "cleaner" language to try out functional programming. Perhaps a Lisp dialect or Haskell can do the trick, since many people around here seem to like these.

Edited 2013-04-19 09:56 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2