Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Nov 2005 20:03 UTC, submitted by tup
Permalink for comment 55990
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Mmm, personally I don't mod down on the content of the post (it's your opinion wether I agree or not is irrelevant) but on the form: if it's insulting, then I mod down.
Now on your post about the giant mess of links, either you get a mess of:
a) directories with very long PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, etc.
b) files within directories: with everything in a few select location, which is the current 'normal Linux way'.
c) links as in Gobo Linux way.
So either way it's a mess, which is 'normal': there are many, many applications so somehow they must be organised..
I think that c) is better than b) for applications, for shared libraries, I don't know how they're handled on Gobo and it's always the hard part..