Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 11th May 2013 21:41 UTC
Windows "Windows is indeed slower than other operating systems in many scenarios, and the gap is worsening." That's one way to start an insider explanation of why Windows' performance isn't up to snuff. Written by someone who actually contributes code to the Windows NT kernel, the comment on Hacker News, later deleted but reposted with permission on Marc Bevand's blog, paints a very dreary picture of the state of Windows development. The root issue? Think of how Linux is developed, and you'll know the answer.
Permalink for comment 561236
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: makes sense
by Deviate_X on Sun 12th May 2013 10:38 UTC in reply to "makes sense"
Member since:

For most of the last 30 years windows have emphasized backward compatibility, so the code written X years ago will still run today. The consequences of this will lead to more bloat and less optimal code supporting mysterious-forgotten corner cases.

Linux being purely engineer lead will more proactively-aggressively route out unneeded code, optimize at the expense of compatibility.

In my personal experience, Linux is faster at many things as a _user_! ls !! But surprisingly isn't that great! And as a developer, there really isn't any worthwhile difference at all.

Reply Parent Score: 3