Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th May 2013 17:26 UTC
Games So, the Xbox One disaster continues. Microsoft's policy for dealing with the used games market has reportedly leaked - and it's a clear and direct attack to destroy the used games market. Prices for used games will be set at the retail value of a new game, and retailers have to hook into Microsoft's computer systems and comply with Microsoft's terms and conditions.
Permalink for comment 563071
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by jigzat
by jigzat on Tue 28th May 2013 22:45 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by jigzat"
Member since:

problem is that you cannot directly compare a physical product with a virtual one. The production model is different, with a physical product the production cost is differed during the life cycle but in software the whole cost is used before selling the first unit. And when you purchase a DVD or a blu-ray or what ever that is not the actual product, it is a distribution form. Is very similar to movies although the time frame to make a profit is smaller.

Let's put an example, when you purchase a movie theater ticket, the ticket is not the movie itself, is just a permission to watch the movie, and lets say that instead of actually paying for a movie ticket you print a very similar one and access the theater or you give it away to everyone around you because you are so cool and believe in freedom, you are not physically robing anyone or breaking into the theater during the night, but you are decrementing the profit of the producers their investors and the theater.

As long as the company remains profitable no biggie, you could say, "you see... printing movie theater tickets doesn't hurt anyone look at X company they are still making profit" but this company makes a big mistake and invest into a crappy movie and they lost a lot of money, so much they declare in bankruptcy because they didn't had any savings. That is when a company say, "look if all the people that watched the previous movie had purchased the ticket we could have more saving to keep working in a different project".

Developing software specially games is not easy, is really expensive, not every product is successful even if it is technically good. You could use as an example free software but most of free software is supported or subsidized by hardware vendors.

I might used the wrong words before, but I meant that investors have the right to protect their profit not to profit no matter what.

So far we have only heard rumors, there is no official stance towards used games so those numbers might be overblown. Thankfully there is competition and they are not going to shoot themselves into the foot.

Piracy is a harsh word that is used broadly by media companies and although the motivation is different the effect of piracy or game borrowing is the same to them.

Some others have said that there are studies that show that people who uses piracy products are more prone to purchase it, but I have only read that study about music, and you are wrongfully applying the same logic to every media.

In music is logical since you listen to you music several times a week during many years, but with movies and video games you won't. Although we all have a favorite movie that we have watched many times in most occasions you play a game or watch a movie once or twice, so most people are not going to pay for a movie after they have seen it.

Just conclude you cannot compare software to a physical product.

Reply Parent Score: 1