Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 28th May 2013 12:59 UTC
Opera Software "Countless hours of hard work, hectoliters of coffee, tons of improvements, two version numbers skipped, and here it is: the all-new Opera for desktop is now out as an Opera Next version, Opera's channel for what used to be called beta. Made from scratch, this version is available for Windows and Mac and brings a new, elegant design and a bunch of new features that will make your browsing experience sleeker and easier than ever." The first version using something called 'Chromium's engine' - I guess they can't call it WebKit anymore, but they can't call it Blink yet either. It's looking great, but the bookmark functionality seems to not have been implemented yet in this preview
Permalink for comment 563450
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Alpha
by PresentIt on Sat 1st Jun 2013 20:55 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Alpha"
PresentIt
Member since:
2010-02-10

And again, I pointed web sites that actually renders badly under Opera, and whooops, you just "forgot" them ;) Tiresome...

That wasn't what I asked you about. Site problems is one of the reason they are switching in the first place.

What YOU need to prove is that they are blaming the sites.

BTW you seems very impressed by articles. Yet, while Opera pretend to have made such an "entirely new and expansive foundation", they could just have configured the UI with all the features of the old one (including M2).

No they couldn't. You are incredibly ignorant.

But back to the topic: You lied about Opera blaming the users, and you lied about Opera only blaming sites.

Reply Parent Score: 2