Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 8th Jun 2013 14:57 UTC
Legal And yes, the PRISM scandal is far, far from over. More and more information keeps leaking out, and the more gets out, the worse it gets. The companies involved have sent out official statements - often by mouth of their CEOs - and what's interesting is that not only are these official statements eerily similar to each other, using the same terms clearly designed by lawyers, they also directly contradict new reports from The New York Times. So, who is lying?
Permalink for comment 564139
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by Nelson
by voidlogic on Sat 8th Jun 2013 20:16 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Nelson"
voidlogic
Member since:
2005-09-03

Not only how much work, but how much would it cost, including server resources?


With the design I have in mind, very little. I tried to make that clear.

Would you be willing to pay for this extra level of security?


Yes. However, a company that claims to be concerned about government invasion of privacy on moral grounds should make this their base offering. I don't think, even at scale, the cost increase would be substantial, at least compared to the current cost of operations.

Reply Parent Score: 3