Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 8th Jun 2013 14:57 UTC
Legal And yes, the PRISM scandal is far, far from over. More and more information keeps leaking out, and the more gets out, the worse it gets. The companies involved have sent out official statements - often by mouth of their CEOs - and what's interesting is that not only are these official statements eerily similar to each other, using the same terms clearly designed by lawyers, they also directly contradict new reports from The New York Times. So, who is lying?
Permalink for comment 564195
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Government?
by orfanum on Sun 9th Jun 2013 08:39 UTC in reply to "Government?"
orfanum
Member since:
2006-06-02

I think the problem exists because there is little or no distinction increasingly. In many places in the world affecting to have democracy, constitutions or recognised legal precedent devise strict lines of formal demarcation between, say, the executive and the judiciary. But at the same time, informal practices have eroded the gulf between the executive/parliament and corporations.

In the UK we have two live examples of this. On the one hand, politicians, especially those in government, are becoming more frustrated since the judges often stick to their legal guns, to the 'detriment' of government policy. On the other, the lobbying scandal here demonstrates how politicians, whether of the Left or of the Right, wear different hats at the same time, one being commercial, and anyway slide easily between the business and political worlds. I even think that they do not see a difference.

Orf.

Reply Parent Score: 3