Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Nov 2005 17:51 UTC, submitted by AdriAn Avila
Permalink for comment 56733
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-30
Since you're calculating for us, perhaps you can do the same for programmers in India, Russia, or Poland. While we're at it, how many third-party commercial widget and theme providers are there for Qt? Am I going to be able to license third-party controls not available as part of the Qt framework, or am I going to have to mine them from KDE? How much should I expect to license these components? If there isn't such an industry around the toolkit, could I save more money by hiring fewer programmers proficient with something else than hiring more to build all of my own widgets not included in the toolkit?
None of this is as simplistic as you want it to be. TT has produced an excellent portable C++ toolkit, and I think it's obviously the best of its kind, but it's not exactly blazing through the proprietary software development world.