Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 5th Nov 2005 17:51 UTC, submitted by AdriAn Avila
Permalink for comment 56779
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
---
Before complaining about KDE, yet I haven't found a good full complete theme for GNOME. All the artwork found on art.gnome.org as well as gnome-look.org are unpleasing to look at, the icons are looking bad, wallpapers look bad and you don't find anything matching.
For KDE I primarily go with the fefault plastik setup and nuvola icons. This setup feels like its made and waiting specially for being used inside KDE.
Besides that a MONO application can not be considered a GNOME application. MONO only happen to have provided GTK# bindings so their default interface uses GTK+ but thats almost all. MONO still isn't a requirement nor part of GNOME and you will see hell freeze the day MONO gets part of GNOME, we will see another topic on OSN saying that MONO is part of GNOME and you see a comment section that passes the 250 comments barrier because of this (which in effect means another at least 200 users more for KDE).