Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 20th Aug 2013 10:39 UTC
In the News Another checkmark in our road towards a totalitarian society: government intimidating the free press, destroying materials, and threatening to take them to court - to shut down a newspaper. No joke. The British government demanded that The Guardian hand over all materials related to Edward Snowden so that they could be destroyed. If the newspaper did not comply, the British government would go to court to shut down The Guardian.

The mood toughened just over a month ago, when I received a phone call from the centre of government telling me: "You've had your fun. Now we want the stuff back." There followed further meetings with shadowy Whitehall figures. The demand was the same: hand the Snowden material back or destroy it. I explained that we could not research and report on this subject if we complied with this request. The man from Whitehall looked mystified. "You've had your debate. There's no need to write any more."

During one of these meetings I asked directly whether the government would move to close down the Guardian's reporting through a legal route - by going to court to force the surrender of the material on which we were working. The official confirmed that, in the absence of handover or destruction, this was indeed the government's intention.

The newspaper told the government that even if they did comply, it would be pointless - all the materials related to Snowden had already been spread throughout the world, the actual editing was done in New York, the journalist in question (Greenwald) lived in Brazil - but the British government stood fast.

And so one of the more bizarre moments in the Guardian's long history occurred - with two GCHQ security experts overseeing the destruction of hard drives in the Guardian's basement just to make sure there was nothing in the mangled bits of metal which could possibly be of any interest to passing Chinese agents. "We can call off the black helicopters," joked one as we swept up the remains of a MacBook Pro.


Permalink for comment 570322
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Talk about overblown
by ilovebeer on Thu 22nd Aug 2013 03:51 UTC in reply to "RE: Talk about overblown"
Member since:

In a democracy, the people are the government. It should not even be talked about in terms of "property".

No, not even close. The people are not the government. The government is a body of elected and appointed persons who are supposed to act in the interest of the states. People elect state officials. The president, for example, is not elected by the people. He/she is elected by electors who are not obligated to vote in agreement with the states majority opinion. The people have very little to do with government and the actual governing of the country.

Also a government absolutely can have property and ownership of things. Being a citizen doesn't entitle you to it directly or indirectly.

Look I find the snowden documents immensely damning, but at the end of the day, it is still stolen property, and it is still within their rights to demand it back.

The government is not a private enterprise. Information can't be stolen by the people who own it (the public).

The public doesn't own those documents any more than they own stealth fighters. The public has no right of ownership what-so-ever to those documents.

We shouldn't allow our biases for snowden to cloud that simple fact.

Your comment contained approximately -1 fact. It was so useless you've actually hastened the heat death of the universe with the energy your brain wasted on its stupidity.

The a pretty bold criticism you have of him considering how confused you are as to what a democratic government is and its relation to the people.

Reply Parent Score: 1