Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Sep 2013 22:16 UTC

Apple's new iPhone 5S, which comes with a fingerprint scanner, won't store actual images of users' fingerprints on the device, a company spokesman confirmed Wednesday, a decision that could ease concerns from privacy hawks.

Rather, Apple's new Touch ID system only stores "fingerprint data", which remains encrypted within the iPhone's processor, a company representative said Wednesday. The phone then uses the digital signature to unlock itself or make purchases in Apple's iTunes, iBooks or App stores.

In practice, this means that even if someone cracked an iPhone's encrypted chip, they likely wouldn't be able to reverse engineer someone's fingerprint.

This seems relatively safe - but then again, only if you trust that government agencies don't have some sort of backdoor access anyway. This used to be tinfoil hat stuff, but those days are long gone.

I dislike the characterisation of privacy "hawks", though. It reminds me of how warmongering politicians in Washington are referred to as 'hawks", and at least in my view, it has a very negative connotation.

Permalink for comment 571887
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Not a great idea...
by Sauron on Thu 12th Sep 2013 04:24 UTC in reply to "Not a great idea..."
Member since:

My thoughts exactly. They toughened up bank card security which led to more intrusive ways the criminals used to get what they wanted. They toughened up car security so there was no way it could be stolen without the keys, that led to burglaries so the f*****s could get the keys, some violent ones at that. Now wait for the violence to escalate and some poor sod have their fingers removed with a penknife and stolen along with their device.

Reply Parent Score: 3