Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Sep 2013 22:16 UTC

Apple's new iPhone 5S, which comes with a fingerprint scanner, won't store actual images of users' fingerprints on the device, a company spokesman confirmed Wednesday, a decision that could ease concerns from privacy hawks.

Rather, Apple's new Touch ID system only stores "fingerprint data", which remains encrypted within the iPhone's processor, a company representative said Wednesday. The phone then uses the digital signature to unlock itself or make purchases in Apple's iTunes, iBooks or App stores.

In practice, this means that even if someone cracked an iPhone's encrypted chip, they likely wouldn't be able to reverse engineer someone's fingerprint.

This seems relatively safe - but then again, only if you trust that government agencies don't have some sort of backdoor access anyway. This used to be tinfoil hat stuff, but those days are long gone.

I dislike the characterisation of privacy "hawks", though. It reminds me of how warmongering politicians in Washington are referred to as 'hawks", and at least in my view, it has a very negative connotation.

Permalink for comment 571888
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Not a great idea...
by jared_wilkes on Thu 12th Sep 2013 04:36 UTC in reply to "Not a great idea..."
Member since:

If someone is about to cut off your fingers, touch your home button and give them the phone.

Likewise, presently, if someone is going to caught off your fingers or do anything mortally harmful to you to access your phone, give them your passcode and the phone.

If your phone contains something that is worth losing your fingers — or any other part of your body — for, do not get into situations where someone will cut off your fingers to get into your phone.

If you generally don't want to lose your phone or fingers, try to avoid or be prepared for situations where someone will cut off your fingers or steal a phone that is useless to them.

Try to be more self-aware, vigilant, and less stupid.

Edited 2013-09-12 04:40 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3