Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Sep 2013 22:16 UTC

Apple's new iPhone 5S, which comes with a fingerprint scanner, won't store actual images of users' fingerprints on the device, a company spokesman confirmed Wednesday, a decision that could ease concerns from privacy hawks.

Rather, Apple's new Touch ID system only stores "fingerprint data", which remains encrypted within the iPhone's processor, a company representative said Wednesday. The phone then uses the digital signature to unlock itself or make purchases in Apple's iTunes, iBooks or App stores.

In practice, this means that even if someone cracked an iPhone's encrypted chip, they likely wouldn't be able to reverse engineer someone's fingerprint.

This seems relatively safe - but then again, only if you trust that government agencies don't have some sort of backdoor access anyway. This used to be tinfoil hat stuff, but those days are long gone.

I dislike the characterisation of privacy "hawks", though. It reminds me of how warmongering politicians in Washington are referred to as 'hawks", and at least in my view, it has a very negative connotation.

Permalink for comment 571902
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not a great idea...
by jared_wilkes on Thu 12th Sep 2013 05:46 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Not a great idea..."
Member since:

Do you really think any of that is going to stop a druggy arsehole? If so you need to get out more and see what happens in certain areas. None of it effects me, I don't have or want a smartphone and if I did I wouldn't touch anything made by Apple with a ten foot bargepole!

Yeah, I can see why a "druggy arsehole" might want to cut off your fingers. I've had my fair share of experience with drug addicts and drug users and people willing to break the law or cause physical harm to get what they want... I feel confident in my ability to navigate the world without losing my fingers... without being paranoid... or a douche bag.

Reply Parent Score: 3