Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Sep 2013 22:16 UTC

Apple's new iPhone 5S, which comes with a fingerprint scanner, won't store actual images of users' fingerprints on the device, a company spokesman confirmed Wednesday, a decision that could ease concerns from privacy hawks.

Rather, Apple's new Touch ID system only stores "fingerprint data", which remains encrypted within the iPhone's processor, a company representative said Wednesday. The phone then uses the digital signature to unlock itself or make purchases in Apple's iTunes, iBooks or App stores.

In practice, this means that even if someone cracked an iPhone's encrypted chip, they likely wouldn't be able to reverse engineer someone's fingerprint.

This seems relatively safe - but then again, only if you trust that government agencies don't have some sort of backdoor access anyway. This used to be tinfoil hat stuff, but those days are long gone.

I dislike the characterisation of privacy "hawks", though. It reminds me of how warmongering politicians in Washington are referred to as 'hawks", and at least in my view, it has a very negative connotation.

Permalink for comment 572068
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[11]: wait
by jared_wilkes on Fri 13th Sep 2013 20:59 UTC in reply to "RE[10]: wait"
Member since:

Umm, you are an idiot. RTFM does not mean: hey there is a fully detailed, technical specification and manual that you would enjoy reading. It means: your comments and/or questions are stupid because you clearly haven't done any reading whatsoever.

When someone posts "RTFM", it doesn't literally translate to: hey, I should search the web for a manual... It means: what you said was stupid, look at what you said, develop a theory for what it may be stupid, then go back and actually read the story, READ the story, and you will see why you are being mocked for not having READ before posting.

Reply Parent Score: 2