Linked by Drumhellar on Wed 25th Sep 2013 22:02 UTC

I've been a big fan of FreeBSD since I first acquired 4.4 on 4 CDs. By that point, I had already spent a lot of time in Linux, but I was always put off by its instability and inconsistency. Once I had FreeBSD installed, it felt like a dream. Everything worked the way it was supposed to, and the consistency of its design meant even older documentation would be mostly applicable without having to figure out how my system was different. There is a reason why in the early days of the Internet, a huge portion of servers ran FreeBSD.

But, that was a while ago. Since then, Linux has matured greatly and has garnered a lot of momentum, becoming the dominant Unix platform. FreeBSD certainly hasn't stood still, however. The FreeBSD team has kept current with hardware support, new features, and a modern, performant design.

Permalink for comment 573381
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

@Soulbender, @Risthel

You said the same thing(with other words) about kernel API breakage :
here -
here -

One does not need to be too much dramatic. Things dont break so easy as you sad.

So both of you dont agree that the Linux driver model could be better? You never see any threads about people having problems after upgrading the kernel?

When anyone, me, or bassbeast or anyone else, point out all the problems with Linux drivers - we get called ugly names, "parrot", "idiot", etc. Is it not acceptable that people thinks the Linux driver model is not good, and could be done better? Linux can not have flaws? The source code is far from good?

Reply Parent Score: 1