Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 10th Oct 2013 16:37 UTC
Apple

Insightful article by John Gruber.

So the irony here is that iOS vs. Android (or, if you prefer, iPhone and iPad vs. commodity smartphones and tablets) is in fact a replay Mac vs. Windows - but not in the way that most who make the comparison would have you believe. Judging by its actions, Apple is keenly aware of the lessons to be learned from 20 years ago. To wit, this has nothing to do with focusing on raw market share, and everything to do with keeping the pedal to the metal on design and quality. If Apple maintains a lead over its rivals in those regards, the Mac suggests that Apple can occupy a dominant, stable, long-term position as the profit leader in the mobile market as well - a market that is already bigger than the PC market ever was, and unlike the PC market, is still growing.

As insightful as the article is, it does pivot on the assumption that Apple does, indeed, "[maintain] a lead over its rivals" in design and quality. Design is largely a matter of taste, but as far as quality goes, Apple has, in my view, been surpassed in almost every aspect by Android - at least, when it comes to software. And let's not even get started on internet services, where Apple is a complete and utter joke compared to its competitors. As far as hardware goes, however, Apple's supposed lead is harder to debate - I've held a lot of phones and tablets in my hands over the years, and while many come close to Apple's, I've never held anything that outright surpassed it (save for maybe the HTC One which no one is buying).

Unsurprisingly, Gruber believes Apple does maintain that lead, and as such, arguing his point becomes relatively easy. However, if you ascribe to the view that Android has surpassed iOS in quality (and certainly in design, in my view), it becomes a lot harder to accept that Apple can, this time, avoid the trap it fell into in the '90s.

Now, before people will twist and turn this into me saying Apple is doomed - I don't believe for a second that it is. However, that doesn't mean a repeat of the '90s is somehow magically off the table - Apple has a lot of work to do in order to avoid it. As Tom Dale stated so aptly almost a year ago, "Google is getting better at design faster than Apple is getting better at web services". With Motorola and the Moto X, design might not be the only thing Google is getting better at faster.

Permalink for comment 574457
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Phones vs tablets
by pandronic on Fri 11th Oct 2013 08:42 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Phones vs tablets"
pandronic
Member since:
2006-05-18

It was late when I wrote my post, so maybe I wasn't all that clear on what my point was, so here goes.

I wasn't trying to suggest that an average user install a custom ROM, I was saying that hardware that is 2.5yo runs incredibly well on a newer version of Android (BTW, it was painful to use on ICS or Honeycomb). Android made a great deal of progress with versions 4.2 and 4.3, to the point that it's as smooth as the iDevices (provided you go with a Nexus or a Google Experience phone or tablet, or you are tech savvy enough to install a custom ROM).

Android is really a mixed bag in terms of quality and experience - there are some great devices which offer a similar experience to Apple + freedom + interoperability between apps and devices (if that's interesting for you) and there are some really horrible devices (*cough* Samsung *cough*), bloated to the point that they barely function. The trick is to choose right. The bottom line is that it's unfair to issue a blanket statement about Android tablets like ze_jerkface did - it shows either ignorance or malevolence.

Reply Parent Score: 4