Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 21st Oct 2013 14:01 UTC

Jeff Atwood:

I had a brief Twitter conversation with Anand Shimpi of Anandtech about this, and he was as perplexed as I was. Nobody could explain the technical basis for this vast difference in idle power management on the same hardware. None of the PC vendors he spoke to could justify it, or produce a Windows box that managed similar battery life to OS X. And that battery life gap is worse today - even when using Microsoft's own hardware, designed in Microsoft's labs, running Microsoft's latest operating system released this week. Microsoft can no longer hand wave this vast difference away based on vague references to "poorly optimized third party drivers".

The new Surface Pro 2 gets 6.6 hours of web browsing battery life. The MacBook Air 11", which has more or less the same hardware and battery, gets more than 11 hours.

I have a Surface RT - the first generation - and as such, I know why. Windows 8 might have Metro running on top of it hiding a lot of it, but Windows 8.x carries just as much baggage, cruft, and outdated shit with it as previous versions of Windows have. Windows 8/8.1 - and Metro in particular - simply suck. Slow, clunky, jarring, cumbersome, battery-sucking, restricted, and limited, with a crappy selection of rush-job, rarely updated applications. You know how resizing windows on Windows 7 or OS X is all nice and fluid? Why, then, is it a slow and jittery operation that brings Windows 8 Metro to its knees?

It's simple: just like battery life, it's a symptom of Microsoft's Windows team not having the balls to truly go for a clean break, as the Windows Phone team have done. And lo and behold, Windows Phone - even WP8, which runs on the same NT kernel - has none of the slowness and crappiness issues that continue to plague Windows 8 Metro (although WP has its own set of issues unrelated to these).

If you want a smooth, modern laptop today - get a MacBook. If you want a smooth and modern tablet, get the Nexus 7 or an iPad. Microsoft still has nothing to show for itself in these areas.

Permalink for comment 575125
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Wow
by acobar on Mon 21st Oct 2013 18:08 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Wow"
Member since:

And with this last imputation you are left with no system at all, as I think you said linux is not the best OS option to use as mainstream personal desktop because of its current DE options.

Poor guy, better fold and stop using any desktop system. ;-)

Really, it is kind of ridiculous when people point fingers at you when some of the criticism you bring are perfectly valid.

No system is perfect and the flaws they carry do not promote them to the top "worst things ever" automatically. My main system is a linux distro (openSUSE), but I am fine with the state of Windows 7 and could use it as my main desktop, which I don't because of many, but manageable, details. Same can be said about Windows 8, even though I prefer the 7 iteration.

Reply Parent Score: 2