Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 1st Nov 2013 09:34 UTC
Legal

A new front opened today in the patent wars between large technology companies, as a consortium that owns thousands of patents from the Nortel bankruptcy auction filed suit against Google and other manufacturers alleging infringement. Rockstar, which is owned jointly by Apple, Blackberry, Ericsson, Microsoft, and Sony, filed suit in US District Court in Texas. In addition to Google, the consortium has alleged infringement by Asus, HTC, Huawei, LG, Pantech, Samsung, and ZTE.

[...]

Since then, as recounted by Wired, Rockstar has been devoted to reverse-engineering the patents and looking for evidence of infringement. "Pretty much anybody out there is infringing," John Veschi, the CEO of Rockstar, told the magazine. "It would be hard for me to envision that there are high-tech companies out there that don't use some of the patents in our portfolio."

I told you Apple and Microsoft were patent trolls. They specifically set up a satellite company that owns nothing but patents, with the sole goal of attacking the competition in the courtroom instead of the market. What a bunch of low-life scum.

I'm surprised by Sony there, though. They use Android themselves.

Permalink for comment 576014
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Just a slight difference
by Nelson on Fri 1st Nov 2013 23:57 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Just a slight difference"
Nelson
Member since:
2005-11-29

The promise was not to seek injunctions over SEPs and to broadly license SEPs on FRAND terms.

Not all of Nortel's patents are SEPs and certainly none of the patents asserted in this litigation are SEPs.


During the course of the division’s investigation, several of the principal competitors, including Google, Apple and Microsoft, made commitments concerning their SEP licensing policies. The division’s concerns about the potential anticompetitive use of SEPs was lessened by the clear commitments by Apple and Microsoft to license SEPs on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, as well as their commitments not to seek injunctions in disputes involving SEPs.



the investigation goes on to note that Google was more ambiguous in their promises and we can now see why, they've been seeking injunctions over SEPs since their Moto acquisition.

If anyone broke their promise it was Google.

cdude is wrong again. Why am I not surprised?

Reply Parent Score: -1