Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 9th Nov 2013 18:44 UTC
Games

The recent news, pictures, and reports about the prototype Steam Machine got me thinking. Since the SteamOS platform is a simple x86 computer, without the kind of restrictions that regular consoles come with, you can simply build the prototype Steam Machine today. However, the big issue is that Valve has done some magic to make sure that the hefty processor and videocard are properly cooled in the tiny prototype enclosure.

For years now, I've been looking for a way to build such a powerful PC in such a tiny package. The problem is that building such a small, powerful PC yourself is not easy - especially not for someone like me, who doesn't have the time to keep up with the honestly irresponsibly large amount of options available in the processor, videocard, cooler, and case markets. It's a mumble-jumble of version numbers, and in the case of video cards, cooling designs, card lengths, and god knows what else.

So, I have a simple question. Say I want to build a small, powerful gaming PC like the Steam Machine prototype, using off-the-shelf parts, for a reasonable price (I would say EUR 600-800). It needs to be properly cooled and as silent as possible, and it needs to be a small console form factor - so a small, horizontal case. Building a powerful, cool gaming PC in a tower is easy. Building it small and console-like, however, is not.

So, if you were to build something like that, which components would you pick? I might - no guarantees! - take up the advice given here and actually build it, if I can justify the spending. Even if I don't - it seems like a nice exercise for the PC builders among us. The laptop, smartphone, and tablet explosion has pushed custom PC building to the sidelines, but I still think it's an incredibly fun and satisfying activity - and if you're good enough, it is, most certainly, an art.

Permalink for comment 576646
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Luminair
by Luminair on Tue 12th Nov 2013 00:31 UTC
Luminair
Member since:
2007-03-30

The constraint is the case. We nerds have been asking for console cases for computers for FAR TOO MANY YEARS and still there are none. So if you want a console case, buy a pre-made system with one. Or wait until assholes get around to selling just a console case.

Your system design at http://s12.postimg.org/fvnsef7v1/build.png is an inefficient use of money for game performance. The highest game performance per dollar comes from the video card up, and I predict this continues up until the $600 video cards... at least. There is a point where more performance is wasted, but new games are very good at consuming performance.

In other words, everything except the video card should be as cheap as possible, and be attached to the most expensive video card you can afford. The floor for this is pretty low. It may go down to 2-core cpus, but I'd go 4-core without proof 2-core is sufficient, because developers will be using 4-cores at least.

4GB memory is sufficient, and so is a hard drive not SSD. Personally I'd get one 8gb DIMM and an SSD, but not if it meant getting the video card you picked.

That power supply and cpu cooler are utterly ridiculous. The CPU is quiet with a retail heatsink the size of a deck of cards, and that computer will use 175W, not 600W.

Reply Score: 3