Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Nov 2013 16:37 UTC
Google

Google has won a resounding victory in its eight-year copyright battle with the Authors Guild over the search giant's controversial decision to scan more than 20 million library and make the available on the internet.

In a ruling (embedded below) issued Thursday morning in New York, US Circuit Judge Denny Chin said the book scanning amounted to fair use because it was "highly transformative" and because it didn't harm the market for the original work.

"Google Books provides significant public benefits," writes Chin, describing it as "an essential research tool" and noting that the scanning service has expanded literary access for the blind and helped preserve the text of old books from physical decay.

Too much common sense. I'm not sure I can handle this.

Permalink for comment 576904
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Here are some facts...
by olafg on Fri 15th Nov 2013 23:01 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Here are some facts..."
olafg
Member since:
2010-05-27

Youtube compensate authors for copyright violations? You mean they actually pay copyright holders for the advertising they have done on their content in the case of infringement and in addition pay the standard rate for displaying the content? The standard for infringing here is that you pay twice the normal licensing-rate (like if you by mistake use a photo or forget to give credit even with a license). I do not think Youtube does this?

You can create an ethical hosting service if you a) make it easy to remove obviously infringing content b) require uploaders to provide verified identity information that is public. Youtube made the takedown process slow in it's formative years, I find it hard to believe that this wasn't on purpose. Youtube would never have gained traction had it not been for the massive plagiarism that took place there in the formative years. Then they can act a bit nicer once they gain critical mass, otherwise the lobbyists will press for regulation. It's a game.

Just about everything Google does is based on making money off other people's IP. Their key business model is:

1. Advertising on the aggregate of other people's IP.

2. Keeping the competition at bay by critical-mass strategies.

Youtube and Google Books is about staying current even when other web search engines reach parity by being broader than other services. Android and Chromebook is about undermining the critical mass bias of competing services (Microsoft/Bing etc).

Like any other big business all ethics go out the window if their actions provides a long-term strengthening/protection of their core business. Then they spin to make it look good in the public's eye.

I don't dislike Google. Their cloud solution is great. Dart is great. Chrome is good. But their ethics in business-critical areas is no better than IBM/Apple/Microsoft/Intel etc. It is a corporation. With corporate strategies.

Reply Parent Score: 2