Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Nov 2013 23:46 UTC
Internet & Networking

"We can end government censorship in a decade," Schmidt said during a speech in Washington. "The solution to government surveillance is to encrypt everything."

Setting aside the entertaining aspect of the source of said statement, I don't think encryption in and of itself is enough. Encryption performed by companies is useless, since we know by now that companies - US or otherwise - are more than eager to bend over backwards to please their governments.

What we need is encryption that we perform ourselves, so that neither governments nor companies are involved. I imagine some sort of box between your home network and the internet, that encrypts and decrypts everything, regardless of source or destination. This box obviously needs to run open source software, otherwise we'd be right back where we started.

Is something like that even possible?

Permalink for comment 577269
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by MOS6510
by kwan_e on Fri 22nd Nov 2013 08:01 UTC in reply to "Comment by MOS6510"
Member since:

I see it differently.

The government should really be encouraging everyone to encrypt. They may think they're getting national security by allowing NSA backdoors, but in reality a backdoor is open to anyone with the same expertise and thus jeopardizes national security.

The government should encourage everyone to get encrypted as it does with vaccination.

Reply Parent Score: 3