Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 25th Nov 2013 17:43 UTC

The Ars Technica article on OS/2 mentions, in passing, Workplace OS, the pie-in-the-sky successor to OS/2 IBM was working on. I found this fantastic journal article written by Brett D. Fleisch and Mark Allan A. Co, which goes into this failed project in great detail.

IBM's Microkernel, named Workplace OS microkernel, was the core components of Workplace OS, a portable successor of OS/2. The basic premise of Workplace OS work was: 1) IBM would adopt and improve the CMU Mach 3.0 microkernel for use on PDAs, the desktop, workstations, and massively parallel machines, and 2) that several operating system personalities would execute on the microkernel platform concurrently. This architecture would allow users to switch between applications written for different operating systems while IBM would also benefit by having one common platform for all product lines. The goals of the microkernel and the technical features of design are described in this paper. We also present lessons that may benefit future projects with similar goals.

Also, I get to use the IBM icon!

Permalink for comment 577420
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Interesting
by boofar on Mon 25th Nov 2013 20:06 UTC in reply to "Interesting"
Member since:

There is even a posix subsystem, "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications", which is still supported on the latest Windows versions. I believe its a proper personality, not just a layer on top of the regular Windows APIs.

Myself, I just installed Cygiwn the last time I had to work on that cursed platform. ;)

Edit: Great article by the way. One phrase kept pooping into my head while reading it: "Second system effect". I was glad to see exactly that was the second item in the Lessons learned chapter.

Edited 2013-11-25 20:09 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1