Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th Dec 2013 13:40 UTC
Windows

The Verge is reporting that Microsoft is considering making Windows RT and Windows Phone free for OEMs, to combat Android.

We understand that any decision to axe the license fees for Windows Phone and Windows RT would be backed by a push for revenue from Microsoft’s apps and services. Microsoft has been experimenting with ads in Windows 8 apps, and any associated revenue from those apps and the company’s built-in Bing search results would help offset the lack of license fees. Microsoft would also push consumers to subscribe to services like SkyDrive, Office, and Skype for additional revenue.

So, let me get this straight. In April this year, a Microsoft-sponsored antitrust complaint about Android had this to say:

Google's predatory distribution of Android at below-cost makes it difficult for other providers of operating systems to recoup investments in competing with Google's dominant mobile platform.

And we have the whole Scroogled campaign (I felt dirty just for visiting that site).

And now they're considering doing the exact same things they claim Google is doing unfairly? Does this company have any internal consistency whatsoever?

Permalink for comment 578548
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by Sisora
by MOS6510 on Thu 12th Dec 2013 11:06 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Sisora"
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

A number of surveys have looked in to this and it is indeed a general trend that iOS users spend more (and not just on iOS/Apple stuff).

I don't think it's because these people like to spend money, but more because they have more money anyway than the average Android user.

When you have a lot of money it makes it easier to spend it I guess.

But what is also a factor, I think, is that a lof of Android users use their phone as a feature phone. They don't even get to the pay button. And why should they, if their needs are so limited.

Reply Parent Score: 1