Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 16th Dec 2013 23:15 UTC
Legal

A federal judge in Washington ruled on Monday that the bulk collection of Americans' telephone records by the National Security Agency is likely to violate the US constitution, in the most significant legal setback for the agency since the first disclosures prompted by the whistleblower Edward Snowden.

Judge Richard Leon declared that the mass collection of metadata probably violates the fourth amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures, and was "almost Orwellian" in its scope. In a judgment replete with literary swipes against the NSA, he said James Madison, the architect of the US constitution, would be "aghast" at the scope of the agency’s collection of Americans' communications data.

It's just a preliminary ruling, and while the judge stated that he would most likely uphold the preliminary ruling after the merits of the case have been handled, there's probably thousands of appeals and stuff like that where this could crumble into dust.

Once a government has obtained a power, it rarely releases it. That's the nature of government - it can only grow.

Permalink for comment 578822
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Debunked
by nagerst on Tue 17th Dec 2013 02:40 UTC
nagerst
Member since:
2013-11-07

Already debunked by J.C Dvorak (the writer of many IT books) and Adam Curry (previous manager of MTV) on the no agenda show. NSA loses no rights against the populace with this verdict. Nothing changes except that new legislation not covered might be passed.

Reply Score: 3