Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Jan 2014 00:02 UTC

Ingrid Lunden explains the significance of the deal (I dislike her headline though, since it falsely implies Google and Samsung were at legal odds):

First, the deal will bolster both Samsung and Google's patent positions against patent infringement allegations and subsequent litigation from competitors, and specifically Apple, which has been involved in acrimonious, multinational patent battles worth billions of dollars against Samsung for years now, over Samsung's Android-powered range of Galaxy smartphones and tablets.

Second, it is a sign of how Google continues to put the patents it gained from its $12.5 billion Motorola acquisition to good use across the Android ecosystem. The ecosystem part is key here. I personally wouldn’t be surprised to see deals like this one appear with other OEMs.

Permalink for comment 581809
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

What a buck loaded of crap. Most patent legal actions are taken to allow or deny money transfer. If you think someone may extract money from you, it is perfectly reasonable to act, under what law allows, to stop, lower or revert your loss, what is what Samsung actually did.

So, no, your analogy on this case is pathetic and also a fallacy.

Reply Parent Score: 2