Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Feb 2014 23:20 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless

Samsung has such a large presence at Mobile World Congress that it doesn't just have one giant booth; there are also several smaller ones scattered around the show halls. While the main booth exclusively shows Android phones and the biggest product of the show was the Android-based Galaxy S5, one of the most important areas for Samsung is a small booth tucked away in the last hall of MWC: a Tizen booth. Here, in the "App Planet" section of Mobile World Congress, Samsung has actual Tizen phones on display - phones with an OS that is fully under Samsung's control. Samsung's choice between Android and Tizen is one of the more interesting stories in tech right now, so when we stumbled upon this booth, we immediately grabbed our cameras and started snapping.

Two things stand out while reading the linked article and watching the video. First, just how unremarkable it all looks and functions. It could easily be mistaken for a Samsung Android device if you squint a bit. This is, perhaps, not surprising, considering the TouchWiz influences. Second, and perhaps more surprisingly, just how snappy, complete, and ready-to-go it all seems to be. Despite the obviously sparse application store, this could easily be sold to consumers right now.

I wonder what the future will hold for Tizen. I'm sure the recent agreements between Google and Samsung preclude the operating system from actually shipping on prominent devices, but I wonder if such a moratorium also applies to limited availability phones and tablets in specific markets.

Permalink for comment 583644
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
tkeith
Member since:
2010-09-01


While I think almost everything from Ars Technica is high quality, I have a much more mixed option of The Verge, for example.


6 months ago I would have agreed with you, but lately Ars Quality has gone downhill fast. When a writer lashes out at a Android engineer and tries to defend something that is proven inaccurate it does not look good.

Reply Parent Score: 2