Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 1st Apr 2014 21:50 UTC
AMD

AMD claims that the microarchitectural improvements in Jaguar will yield 15% higher IPC and 10% higher clock frequency, versus the previous generation Bobcat. Given the comprehensive changes to the microarchitecture, shown in Figure 7, and the additional pipeline stages, this is a plausible claim. Jaguar is a much better fit than Bobcat for SoCs, given the shift to AVX compatibility, wider data paths, and the inclusive L2 cache, which simplifies system architecture considerably.

Some impressive in-depth reporting on the architecture which powers, among other things, the current generation of game consoles.

Permalink for comment 585828
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Wow
by przemo_li on Wed 2nd Apr 2014 12:53 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Wow"
przemo_li
Member since:
2010-06-01

Those GDDR5 RAM kill that assessment.

And we still have no reliable API that is equivalent to PS4 low level api. (Mantle aint finished yet)

So not only PS4 have better RAM then is available to PC build (AMD APUs love RAM!), but also still should be able to push more data, compute more, and render more, then in Win/Lin/OSX.

PS ... but I will go Lin + AMD APU next time I go shopping anyway ;)

Edited 2014-04-02 12:54 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3