Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Apr 2014 19:55 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y

I'm using the URL slug headline for this one (check the link).

This map showing the locations of 280 million individual posts on Twitter shows a depressing divide in America: Tweets coming from Manhattan tend to come from iPhones. Tweets coming from Newark, N.J., tend to come from Android phones.

If you live in the New York metro area, you don't need to be told that Manhattan is where the region's rich people live, and the poor live in Newark. Manhattan's median income is $67,000 a year. Newark's is $17,000, according to U.S. Census data.

This fascinates me, as it seems to be a very American thing. In The Netherlands, Android has an 80% market share, and we have far lower poverty rates than the US (that Newark median income is crazy low by Dutch standards). I'm pretty sure the situation is similar for many other West-European nations.

This raises an interesting question: is it 'Android is for poor people' - or is it 'Android is for poor people in America'?

Permalink for comment 586541
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
WorknMan
Member since:
2005-11-13

Because if you're poor it's your fault and you deserve to be mocked for it, right?


If you're in America and you're over the age of 30, then it probably is. There are entire college curriculums online for people to consume; with Android tablets being as cheap as $50 and free wifi hotspots all over town, you might be poor, but you don't have to stay that way. That might not be enough to get you a 6 figure salary, but it should be enough to get you above the poverty level, where you can start taking some real classes.

Reply Parent Score: -2