Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd May 2014 20:03 UTC
Talk, Rumors, X Versus Y

So I set myself the task of picking five great works of software. The criteria were simple: How long had it been around? Did people directly interact with it every day? Did people use it to do something meaningful? I came up with the office suite Microsoft Office, the image editor Photoshop, the videogame Pac-Man, the operating system Unix, and the text editor Emacs.

Each person has his or her own criteria for these sorts of things, but in my view, this list is woefully inadequate. If it were up to me, I would pick these, in no particular order:

  • A-0 System: the first ever compiler, written by Grace Hopper in 1951 and 1952, for the UNIVAC I.
  • UNIX: This one's a given.
  • WorldWideWeb/CERN HTTPd: the first web browser and the first web server, both written by Tim Berners-Lee. Also a given.
  • Xerox Star: this one is actually a tie between the Star, its research predecessor the Alto, and Douglas Engelbart's NLS. These three combined still define the way we do computing today - whether you look at a desktop, a smartphone, or a tablet. I decided to go with the Star because it was the only one of the three that was commercially available, and because it's so incredibly similar to what we still use today.
  • Windows: you cannot have a list of the greatest software of all time without Windows. You may not like it, you may even hate it, but the impact Windows has had on the computing world - and far, far beyond that - is immense. Not including it is a huge disservice to the operating system that put a computer on every desk, in every home.

This leaves a whole bunch of others out, such as Lotus 1-2-3, DOS, the Mac OS, Linux, and god knows what else - but such is the nature of lists like this.

Permalink for comment 588036
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Dasher42
Member since:
2007-04-05

I'm sorry, but on a list where you're tracing back innovation to the originals like A-0, NLS, or CERN, Windows absolutely does not belong. Windows is in almost every respect a rehash built on top of broken standards, driven by marketing, not technical progress, and most of this readership knows it.

The graphical desktop? That was pioneered by PARC and brought to the public by the Mac. Desktop multimedia with pre-emptive multitasking? That's the Amiga. Most of what's good in more recent Windows iterations has been warmed over from VMS and Unix.

Why did the Windows world wait until 1995 catch up to the rest of the world in allowing anything beyond 8.3 filenames??

Putting Windows on a list like this is just painting a target on yourself on a site read by those knowledgeable on the subject.

Reply Score: 7